When picking up a book
subtitled “The Life and Death of a Man of Character,” you could probably give a
pretty good guess as to what you might find inside. First off, it would not be
a surprise if the book was presented as a kind of moral guide— here is a famous
and profitable man who lived in a certain way, so perhaps you should consider
living like this too. Second, the story must in some way end in success.
Finally, our protagonist must live up to his description of being “of
character.” The Mayor of Casterbridge, however, is written by
Thomas Hardy, which basically means that all bets are off.
The story starts off with a
rather common occurrence: the selling of a man’s wife and child. I mean,
who hasn’t accidentally sold one’s wife and daughter for five and a quarter
pounds amid a drunken haze? The vendor in this situation turns out to be our
very own “man of character,” Michael Henchard. He has decided that his wife
Susan and daughter Elizabeth-Jane are responsible, like many others, for
"the frustration of many a promising youth's high aims and hopes and the
extinction of his energies by an early imprudent marriage" (5). Upon
saying this, Michael has forever doomed himself to live in the shadow of these
words. The story quickly advances following the auction, we soon find ourselves
amid the bustle of the rural village of Casterbridge, some time in the future.
Once more of the goings on
of Casterbridge are revealed, we soon see that Henchard, who has somehow grown
from a lowly hay-trusser into the town's mayor, has tried his best to put the
sale of his wife behind him. He is involved in the corn business and is
actually quite a merchant. Henchard manages to buy several tons of a crop of
corn that refuses to be ground into wheat, causing widespread anger among the
people he is at the moment representing. Henchard is also revealed to have
sworn off drinking after the auction, mainly blaming the alcohol for his past
mistake.
Finally, and most important
to the characterization of Henchard, is his response to learning that his sold
wife and child, after nineteen years, have found themselves in Casterbridge.
Henchard, rather than owning up to his past mistakes, decides that money and
secrecy will solve everything. He decides to pretend like he has never met his
wife before, and to court and wed her as if they had just fallen in love. All
of this is done while Henchard feels little for Susan, mainly because he has
already given his heart to another woman in a neighboring county. Of course,
Henchard refuses to "'let her know the truth'" (57), and instead
sends his sweetheart a nice bundle of money to keep her quiet.
Henchard as our “man of
character” is only classified by his mistakes. These are what govern his life,
as for Henchard, the past seems to have the nasty habit of popping up again and
again. He puts it perfectly when he states outright that "the Mayor of
Casterbridge is not so thriving in his mind as it seems he might be from the
state of his pocket" (58).
Susan and Elizabeth-Jane,
the once and future family of Michael Henchard, can both easily be described as
“wet noodles.” Both women seem to be unable to function on their own. Susan
feels tied to the man who bought her, saying that he "had acquired a
morally real and justifiable right to her by his purchase" (17), and
happily lives under this illusion for over a decade. When he dies, Susan
decides that she is actually not happy in a home that she was given no choice
in joining (shocker) and goes to seek out Henchard.
Elizabeth-Jane on the other
hand seems unable to see what is right in front of her face. Her mother
describes her upbringing by saying "It had seemed, indeed, folly ot think
of making Elizabeth-Jane wise" (17). Elizabeth-Jane does certainly live up
to this description-- she is by no means wise and fails to see that the
relationship between her mother and Henchard is a bit more than long lost
cousins.
The only likable character
found thus far in the book is Donald Farfrae, a man so charming to me that it
almost makes up for everyone else we meet in the book. Donald is a Scotchman
who comes to Casterbridge as a last stop before he starts his journey across
the pond. In no time at all, he solves Henchard’s corn problem, causing him to
extend a hand of friendship and a job as the manager of all things corn. Donald
agrees, and quickly integrates himself into Henchard’s life.
It takes little time to see
that Donald and Henchard are sheer opposites— foils even. Where Henchard is
depressed, mathematically challenged, and emotionally reliant, Donald is happy,
a scientist by nature, and logical. When no clear path appears to Henchard, the
solution is obvious to Donald. It is of little doubt (I say with delight) that
Donald will continue to stay a large portion of the story as he supports Henchard
through his emotionally unsure times. Perhaps there is hope after all for
happiness to beat Hardy’s signature depression.
Cooper-Good discussion of characters and your reactions to them. Why is it that Susan wants to seek out her former husband? Is she angry with him? Or is she seeking some sort of reconciliation?
ReplyDeleteHi Coop! I enjoyed your analysis, as it brought to my attention a few things I had not considered before. I am interested to know whether you think Michael will ever redeem himself fully? I'd also be curious about your reaction to my analysis of Susan and Elizabeth-Jane as I think mine are a bit more generous than yours are. Can't wait to continue this journey with you!
ReplyDeleteP.S. You might want to consider changing your font size and/or spacing, because it is a little difficult to read.
Hey Cooper!
ReplyDeleteFirst of all, great title! I love how you infuse your writing with humor, particularly, "Who hasn’t accidentally sold one’s wife and daughter for five and a quarter pounds amid a drunken haze?"
I have never read the book, but I find it highly likely that Susan and Elizabeth-Jane will at some point figure out that Henchard is their former husband and father, respectively. Secrecy and money never seem to last long. I am very curious as to whether this prediction will be proved correct. Please let me know if it does!
Do you feel any sympathy for Henchard? From your writing it sounds like his mistakes cause you pure annoyance. I am curious as to whether there are any positive qualities attributed to Henchard or whether his character is simply a bumbling idiot.
Overall, great job!! -Caitie
Hi Cooper! I am loving your blog so far, such voice. You make me want to read your novel. I do have a question, why do you think that the women are portrayed as 'wet noodles'? Do you think this is simply because the book was published in 1886 when one-dimensional female characters were common or is it a way for the author to make another point about humans and society?
ReplyDeleteHi Cooper!
ReplyDeleteI have not read this book before so I hope I am getting my information correctly, but from what it seems the characters seem to be reliant on one another, except for Donald. It also seems that Michel is unable to escape his past mistakes and seems to try to keep attempting at success but finds failure instead. You mentioned that he tried to rid himself of the things that he believed held him back from becoming successful, his wife and child, and that he did become successful afterward but that that mistake caught up with him and ultimately backfired on him. Do you believe that this is a possible theme in the novel and connects to the theme presented in Song of Solomon about ridding oneself of inner strife and learning from life experiences to succeed or become a better person who is more understanding of others adversities?
Cooper, your writing is hilarious and I am very glad you have picked up blogging- I am looking forward to following your page.
ReplyDeleteYour explanation of the characters in this novel was very helpful! I like how you incorporated quotes and gave your personal 2 cents about each of them. You don't seem to be very fond of many of the characters in this novel. Why do you think that Thomas Hardy chose to make his characters so unlikable? Is he writing a satire of sorts, or is it too early in the book to tell?
I'm excited to read more of your posts!
Nice post but, wow, you really don't like Henchard. Of course, he's done some pretty awful things. But I've got a lot of sympathy for him, since he's really so desperate for reconciliation (but can't get it). Good thing our takes on the book so far are a little different, though, or we'd have nothing to argue over.
ReplyDeleteYour tone and style are incredibly clear, which I can really appreciate since it makes reading your posts rather entertaining. The humor is woven in expertly, as it doesn't occur too often or not often enough - rather, it's just right. Your opinions of the characters are very apparent, and they are fit in with the character descriptions often times. It's a very interesting style of character introduction, since you seem to voice how you feel about characters without directly stating anything. Overall, due to how well this blog post was crafted I really look forward to reading the following ones.
ReplyDelete